ExemptLink
Discuss a pilot
ExemptLink
Home/Evaluation method
Reviewed ground truth

Prove the gap.
Then test the budget.

The pilot must establish value beyond existing ECM, tax-engine alerts and human processes. A polished demo does not demonstrate demand.

Read pilot protocol Compare workflows

Research-stage concept · illustrative product preview

EXEMPTLINK / EVALUATION METHODCONCEPT PREVIEW
Incremental value is the questionBaseline alerts and reviewed findings occupy separate lanes, with new gaps still unknown.Incremental value is the questionDEMO / ILLUSTRATIVE · concept previewExisting processSuite alerts / configurationBaseline review effortPreviously known gapsReviewed sampleTax-owner ground truthNew / known / uncertainRemediation effortBuyer-confirmed incremental gaps and a funded pilot determine the decision.
Illustrative mobile scene
Baseline coverage
Reviewed ground truth
Funded commitment

Incremental value is the question

Readable comparison; no fabricated accuracy.

Human review required
DEMO — SYNTHETIC DATAFinite sequence · reviewed states
The denominator

100 reviewed sales.
Not 100 AI assertions.

MeasureDefinitionDo not confuse with
Unsupported exemptions per 100Tax-lead-confirmed unsupported claims within the agreed sample.Model confidence or document absence alone.
Previously unidentified gapsConfirmed gaps not already in the buyer’s current-suite alerts or known register.Existing alerts repeated by a new UI.
Remediable findingsA clear next step with a named owner and appropriate evidence requirement.An unresolved interpretation without an action.
False positives / omissionsWarnings rejected by reviewer; reviewed gaps the workflow failed to surface.Self-reported model accuracy.
Total review effortTime to inspect, classify and prepare the approved next action.A narrow OCR-processing time.
Funded pilotSigned scope and payment commitment from the actual buyer.Visits, CTR, demo clicks or form drafts.
The decision path

Evidence before expansion.

01Current coverage

Capture suite alerts and baseline effort.

02Tax-owner review

Classify gaps, false warnings and omissions.

03Incremental value

Confirm new, remediable findings.

04Commercial decision

Agree a signed and funded pilot.

Acceptance criteria

Proceed on reviewed evidence.

Previously unidentified, remediable gaps; tax-owner sign-off; a bounded paid audit-prep pilot; agreed access and responsibility.

Kill criteria

Stop if the job is already closed.

The incumbent achieves equivalent coverage at lower total review cost, findings cannot be verified, or the buyer will not commit to a funded scope.

Expansion is conditional.

Resale and industry-specific exemptions require further jurisdiction research. VAT is a later hypothesis, outside this starting scope.

A bounded first step

Start with a sample.
Find out what it adds.

One state. 100 historical exempt sales. One selected workflow. A decision grounded in your tax owner’s review.

Discuss a pilot Proposed pilot · no records required to start